From NWChem
Viewed 1145 times, With a total of 2 Posts
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Threads 61
Posts 291
|
|
| 8:28:23 PM PST - Wed, Nov 5th 2014 |
|
Test tce_cr_eomccsd_t_xmem has passed and the two excited state energies are 1.92541 eV(total energy / hartree = -224.888619708807965) and 4.75386 eV(total energy / hartree = -224.784676163505708),
respectively.
Another molecule having the geometry optimized by mp2 and with the similar input except for the use of aug-cc-pvdz and larger xmem setting instead encounted non-convergent problem during ROHF iterations at c1 symmetry, and additional symmetry broken problem if the other symmetry was employed, although MAXITER was increased to 200 in both.
My question was how to make quadratical ROHF converge in cr_eomccsd_t_xmem calculation?
By the way, how to print oscillator strength?
|
|
Edited On 8:29:37 AM PST - Sun, Dec 28th 2014 by Xiongyan21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Threads 61
Posts 291
|
|
| 5:28:07 PM PST - Thu, Nov 6th 2014 |
|
| How to do explicit basis set definitions from the basis set exchange?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Threads 61
Posts 291
|
|
| 6:34:10 PM PST - Thu, Nov 6th 2014 |
|
| A calculation using z-matrix for the molecule having the geometry optimized by mp2 got the required convergence in several steps easily and swiftly.
|
|
Edited On 8:42:03 PM PST - Thu, Nov 6th 2014 by Xiongyan21
|
|
|
AWC's:
2.5.10 MediaWiki - Stand Alone Forum Extension
Forum theme style by: AWC
