Sulfur Correlation Consistent Inconsistencies

From NWChem

Viewed 486 times, With a total of 2 Posts
Jump to: navigation, search

Just Got Here
Threads 1
Posts 2
1. The Gaussian contraction coefficients change for the tight functions of the cc-pV(D+d)Z and cc-pCVDZ basis sets, depending on what program the basis set is being exported for. MOLCAS export reports that the exponent 0.157 for the s shell has four nonzero contraction coefficients, but Dalton (and most other programs) exports only give the 0.157 exponent a single nonzero contraction coefficient. I've seen the same problem in cc-pCVTZ, and it likely afflicts most of the correlation consistent basis sets.

2. For some reason, the ACESII basis sets are rounded one digit more than in the proper basis sets.
Edited On 2:46:40 PM PDT - Fri, Mar 16th 2018 by JonathonM.

Forum Vet
Threads 9
Posts 1580
Did you try to untick the "Optimized General Contractions" box and see if it makes any difference in the MOLCAS and Dalton output?

Just Got Here
Threads 1
Posts 2
Yes, ticking/unticking "optimized general contractions" resolved my "issue".

Thanks for your help, and sorry for the false alarm!

Forum >> BSE: Basis Set Exchange >> General BSE Topics

Who's here now Members 0 Guests 1 Bots/Crawler 0

AWC's: 2.5.10 MediaWiki - Stand Alone Forum Extension
Forum theme style by: AWC