appropriate units for mu when using range-separated functional?

From NWChem

Viewed 580 times, With a total of 1 Posts
Jump to: navigation, search
Forum >> NWChem's corner >> General Topics

Clicked A Few Times
Threads 9
Posts 19
12:08:47 PM PST - Wed, Jan 15th 2014
I am working with the range-separated functional LC-BLYP. In the literature, many authors present the range-separation parameter mu as unitless, while a few present it in inverse bohr. The inverse distance interpretation makes more sense to me, but the NWChem documentation does not say anything about units: the documentation tells us that the default value is mu=0.33, but there are no units. Does anyone know if this is 0.33 inverse bohr? I input the coordinates of my molecule in angstroms, if that matters.

Thanks in advance for any information.

  • Niri Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, NWChemDeveloper, bureaucrat, sysop
    Profile
    Send PM
Gets Around
Threads 4
Posts 152
9:22:05 PM PST - Wed, Jan 15th 2014
Hi Kenley,
The units are inverse bohr. mu is used in the error function which is used in the attenuation.
I'll add this to the documentation.

Best,
-Niri
niri.govind@pnl.gov


Forum >> NWChem's corner >> General Topics



Who's here now Members 0 Guests 1 Bots/Crawler 0

AWC's: 2.5.10 MediaWiki - Stand Alone Forum Extension
Forum theme style by: AWC
Retrieved from "http://www.nwchem-sw.org/index.php/Special:AWCforum/st/id1114/appropriate_units_for_mu_when_us....html"