From NWChem
			Viewed 2538 times, With a total of 1 Posts
												
			
                  
        
            
                |  | 
            
                | 
                        
                            | Just Got HereThreads 2 Posts 3
 |  | 
		                    
		                        | 8:16:15 AM PDT - Fri, Jun 27th 2014 |  |  
		                        | Hi, 
 I'm having some trouble running a QM/MM optimization on a system of a large protein in a box of solvent.  I found that when I define two regions, qm and mm, the QM region optimizes reasonably, but the other atoms (MM) barely move at all.  In the first cycle of optimization, the MM atoms undergo only about 40 steps of minimization.  On the other hand, when I define two regions qm and solvent (i.e., not including the MM atoms of the protein), the solvent undergoes about 1400 steps of optimization during the first cycle, and the atoms move as would be expected during a minimization task.  This is strange, since solvent is a subset of mm, so it's surprising that using mm for the minimization protocol would have a barely distinguishable effect, but solvent would look normal.
 
 The system is one that had already been minimized and had undergone an MD run (for equilibration) in AMBER, with the entire system being under MM control (light restraints on the future QM region).  Also, I am using TIP3P water for the solvent, but I don't think that has caused any problems (I wrote a T3E fragment and segment file).
 
 Here is the input file, run.nw:
 
 
 start fgfr
 permanent_dir ./output
 scratch_dir ./scratch
 
 charge -4
 
 prepare
 source density-out.pdb
 new_top new_seq
 solvent name HOH model T3E
 new_rst
 amber
 modify atom 169:_CB quantum
 #### 39 more atoms modified as quantum here
 modify atom 320:_HD2 quantum
 update lists
 ignore
 write fgfr_ref.rst
 write fgfr_ref.pdb
 end
 task prepare
 
 md
 mwm 32000
 msa 32000
 system fgfr_ref
 noshake solute
 print topol solvent
 record coord 20
 end
 
 basis
 * library "6-31G"
 end
 
 dft
 xc b3lyp
 maxiter 2000
 end
 
 qmmm
 link_atoms hydrogen
 ###### HERE IS THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FILES:#######################
 region qm mm ##### NOTE: in the other file, this says "region qm solvent"
 ########################################################################
 maxiter 10 3000
 ncycles 5
 density espfit
 xyz qregion
 end
 
 task qmmm dft optimize
 
 I would really appreciate any help or pointers anyone can provide.  I am happy to provide any input/output/processing files that would help.
 
 Thank you for your time.
 Sincerely,
 Jerry Karp
 Laboratory of Dr. David Cowburn
 Albert Einstein College of Medicine
 |  | 
 
        |  | 
        
              
        
            
                |  | 
            
                | 
                        
                            | Just Got HereThreads 2 Posts 3
 |  | 
		                    
		                        | 1:08:32 PM PDT - Mon, Jul 7th 2014 |  |  
		                        | I think I've solved the problem.  It appears there were some bad angle parameters in the segment file I created for one of the special residues.  When those were corrected, the optimization worked fine with selection of mm.  (I only caught this when I tried to run dynamics with the protein and that residue sparked an error.) 
 Thanks.
 
 Sincerely,
 Jerry Karp
 Laboratory of Dr. David Cowburn
 Albert Einstein College of Medicine
 |  | 
 
        |  | 
        
      
        	
            
                AWC's:
                 2.5.10 MediaWiki - Stand Alone Forum Extension
Forum theme style by: AWC